Boat Drinks  

Go Back   Boat Drinks > General > Sport

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 20-03-2008, 14:55   #11
divine
Moonshine
 
divine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Southampton
Posts: 3,201
Default

If there was money to be had in it, ITV wouldn't have ended the contract though, the fact they have implies the revenue isn't flowing as well as predicted, the advertising isn't supporting the costs etc.

It would seem silly of ITV to dump F1 if it was still making them money considering they're a commercially funded broadcaster. The BBC can show any old crap regardless of ratings and still get the money, ITV can't.
__________________
divine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20-03-2008, 15:47   #12
Garp
Preparing more tumbleweed
 
Garp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 6,038
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by divine` View Post
If there was money to be had in it, ITV wouldn't have ended the contract though, the fact they have implies the revenue isn't flowing as well as predicted, the advertising isn't supporting the costs etc.

It would seem silly of ITV to dump F1 if it was still making them money considering they're a commercially funded broadcaster. The BBC can show any old crap regardless of ratings and still get the money, ITV can't.
Given what Bernie is saying in that report, it would suggest that its more that ITV aren't interested in pursuing other potential revenue streams for it either, just keep on doing the TV thing, whereas he's wanting other options considered. Under those circumstances I'm sure he just wouldn't look at doing anything with ITV. He could well have made it clear to his contacts at ITV what he'd like to see, that info get to the production team and them say amongst themselves "No.. too much hassle, it'd wipe out profits", then decide not to renew. The BBC has a much more technically capable setup, and better infrastructures in place (plus stuff already in place to take serious advantage of BT's 21CN network), for them to offer streaming of F1 stuff, for example, would be much less of a hassle or cost. They might well be able to provide the whole thing at much less cost that ITV ever could.
__________________
Mal: Define "interesting"?
Wash: "Oh, God, oh, God, we're all gonna die"?
Garp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20-03-2008, 17:41   #13
Pickers
Absinthe
 
Pickers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Cornwall
Posts: 2,692
Default

I was gutted when F1 moved to ITV - chuffed to bits now its going back to BBC \/
__________________

Pictures
Pickers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21-03-2008, 00:58   #14
Goose
The list is long, but distinguished
 
Goose's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Ã…rhus, Denmark
Posts: 1,643
Default

Any idea when it's going to be made exciting again?
__________________
Goose is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21-03-2008, 01:41   #15
Garp
Preparing more tumbleweed
 
Garp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 6,038
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Goose View Post
Any idea when it's going to be made exciting again?
We were debating about this on a geeks mailing list I'm on. We reckon what they ought to do is say "No rules at all, except that your car must be able to complete the race on an amount of fuel decided on the day, between xx gallons and xx gallons".
Giving the car mfgs free reign could result in some very interesting cars, use of ground effect etc.etc.
__________________
Mal: Define "interesting"?
Wash: "Oh, God, oh, God, we're all gonna die"?
Garp is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:31.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.