12-03-2012, 14:17 | #11 |
Absinthe
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,247
|
^
Also it can be more difficult to raise capital when you're a sole trader. Have you been in business before? What do you (intend to) do?
__________________
I'm not Burnsy, you cretin. |
12-03-2012, 14:38 | #12 |
The Last Airbender
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Pigmopad
Posts: 11,915
|
You're right in that limited will give more protection but as you ask above, it really does depend on what you intend to do. With a limited company, every penny has to be accounted for with receipts and things have to be bought through the business account. Being a sole trader makes this far more open and easier to administer meaning you could possibly run more through the business than you'd get away with being limited.
__________________
|
12-03-2012, 18:05 | #13 |
Absinthe
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Chester
Posts: 2,345
|
From what I've been reading it would be the better route, but wouldn't be of benefit to me.
I'm an IT contractor and have been working under an umbrella for almost 2 years. I get work through an agency, which according to the latest thing I've read isn't something thats open to sole traders http://www.contracteye.co.uk/sole_tr...ntractor.shtml |
14-03-2012, 15:46 | #14 |
Provider of sensible advice about homosexuals
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: London
Posts: 2,615
|
Sole trader may not be a good option for other reasons but the limitation of liability that you get with a limited company of some designation tends to only really matter where you're doing something that would normally incur significant amounts of liability. If you're in a business where there is little to no liability accruing to you then it becomes somewhat more of an irrelevance - that doesn't mean it's always a good idea to be a sole trader, more that the limitation of liability isn't necessarily a huge plus point for the other types of business.
__________________
"Your friend is the man that knows all about you, and still likes you." - Elbert Hubbard |
15-03-2012, 16:33 | #15 |
Absinthe
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Chester
Posts: 2,345
|
my iPad is on its way up from Nuneaton
|
16-03-2012, 01:27 | #16 |
Screaming Orgasm
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Newbury
Posts: 15,194
|
Keeping my iPad2. I can't see the pixels on my iPad2 from six inches away so it's a Retina display as far as I'm concerned.
|
22-03-2012, 23:08 | #17 | |
Absinthe
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,023
|
Quote:
I adore my iPad3 I must say. The screen has exceeded all my expectations
__________________
|
|
24-03-2012, 20:55 | #18 |
Screaming Orgasm
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Newbury
Posts: 15,194
|
Yeah, I'm serious. Admittedly not side-by-side, but I loaded up BBC News on a 2 and 3 in the local Apple store and the difference, to me, was so small it wasn't worth bothering (possibly a little sharper, but that's all). I'll do a fairer comparison next time I go (with my iPad2 vs their 3).
If you've got 20/20 vision, I'm sure it is Resolutionary. If you don't, it just isn't. Same goes for the Retina display on the iPhone as well. Sorry Apple, no sale. Must admit though that I didn't realise just how bad the camera on the iPad2 is. I was taking photos at a conference for future reference and had I known I'd have used my iPhone instead. |