Boat Drinks  

Go Back   Boat Drinks > General > Computer and Consoles

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-12-2007, 12:58   #1
After_8
Nice weak cup of Earl Grey
 
After_8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 47
Default All EVE players read here - VERY IMPORTANT

You're probably aware of this already, but in case you missed it, go read this page: http://eve-online.com/news/newsOfEve.asp?newsID=500

Summary is that somebody stuck a \ in the wrong place in the patcher scripts which caused the patcher to accidentally delete c:\boot.ini. If you're running XP, this renders the PC unable to reboot. The link details how to fix it.
__________________
"I'm happy to grow up, but I won't pretend that fun things aren't still fun out of fear of looking silly."
After_8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2007, 12:59   #2
Feek
ex SAS
 
Feek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: JO01ou
Posts: 10,062
Default

At least it does if you're using XP and have Eve installed on your C drive.

Vista, and users with it on different drives are unaffected.

Luckily, I come under the second camp on both instances
__________________
Feek is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2007, 13:26   #3
Dymetrie
A large glass of Merlot
 
Dymetrie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Letchworth with a Lightsaber
Posts: 5,819
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Feek View Post
At least it does if you're using XP and have Eve installed on your C drive.

Vista, and users with it on different drives are unaffected.

Luckily, I come under the second camp on both instances
I resemble this statement
__________________

Khef, Ka and Ka-Tet....
Dymetrie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2007, 13:34   #4
After_8
Nice weak cup of Earl Grey
 
After_8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 47
Default

I'm on Vista too, so I was able to safely sit back and laugh at all the people who didn't believe the warnings. Makes a nice change to see the anti-Vista camp squirm
__________________
"I'm happy to grow up, but I won't pretend that fun things aren't still fun out of fear of looking silly."
After_8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2007, 14:42   #5
Daz
The Stig
 
Daz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Swad!
Posts: 10,713
Default

Whoever wrote that patcher needs a kicking :|
__________________
apt-get moo
Daz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2007, 14:56   #6
Davey_Pitch
I iz speshul
 
Davey_Pitch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Liverpool
Posts: 6,296
Default

Indeed. I'd like to know how a game patch, almost certainly designed to interact with the files in the program install location, can delete something from the root of C:, even with an incorrect / in the script. Poor programming methinks.
__________________

Our deepest fear is not that we are inadequate. Our deepest fear is that we are powerful beyond measure. It is our light, not our darkness, that most frightens us. Your playing small does not serve the world. There is nothing enlightened about shrinking so that other people won't feel insecure around you. We are all meant to shine as children do. It's not just in some of us; it is in everyone. And as we let our own lights shine, we unconsciously give other people permission to do the same. As we are liberated from our own fear, our presence automatically liberates others.
Davey_Pitch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2007, 15:02   #7
Feek
ex SAS
 
Feek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: JO01ou
Posts: 10,062
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Davey_Pitch View Post
Indeed. I'd like to know how a game patch, almost certainly designed to interact with the files in the program install location, can delete something from the root of C:, even with an incorrect / in the script. Poor programming methinks.
It's the rogue \ that does it

command in the installer

"delete \boot.ini"

instead of "delete %applicationinstallpath%\boot.ini"

QA testing was probably done with the client not installed on the C drive, or on a box using Vista.

At least they've pulled the patch quickly as soon as it was realised. The full installer doesn't have that problem.
__________________
Feek is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2007, 17:22   #8
Daz
The Stig
 
Daz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Swad!
Posts: 10,713
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Feek View Post
QA testing was probably done with the client not installed on the C drive, or on a box using Vista.
Then their QA is dire and the guy who keeps tabs on that should be shot as well

It's strange though, I mean, to name a file identical to a system one is just ridiculous. It almost sounds like they were screwing around with each other on day in the office and some pleb published some piss about code without checking.

Anyway, I've spent today dealing with the stupidity of idiots, so I'm not in the most tolerable mood for things like this
__________________
apt-get moo
Daz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2007, 17:29   #9
Mark
Screaming Orgasm
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Newbury
Posts: 15,194
Default

Meh. One of our products reference counted user32.dll (or similar) in the installer. God alone knows why, but it did. I'm sure you can guess what happened when the software got uninstalled.

Luckily muggins here ended up on the wrong end of it and worked out what we'd broke before it got as far as a real customer.
Mark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2007, 19:08   #10
Del Lardo
Absinthe
 
Del Lardo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Cambridge
Posts: 2,539
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Feek View Post
QA testing was probably done with the client not installed on the C drive, or on a box using Vista.
As a former software test engineer that reeks of piss poor testing.
Del Lardo is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:55.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.